[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經集解](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763) › 64.34 # 大般涅槃經集解 64.34 大般涅槃經集解 64.34 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [64.34](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.64.34) 案僧亮曰：此下別答也。法身有真有應，真身是常、應身無常。或者見應滅，謂真亦滅。聞真身常，謂應身亦常，所以起諍也。寶亮曰：佛此二說，皆各有為，但執者乖衷，是以成諍。此釋第一諍論。 > Sengliang comments: From here below is the specific answer. The dharmakāya has the true and the responsive: the true body is nitya, while the responsive body is anitya. Confused people, seeing the extinction of the responsive \[body\], say that the true \[body\] is also extinguished. Hearing that the true body is nitya, they say that the responsive body is also nitya; this is why dispute arises. Baoliang comments: The Buddha's two teachings each had their own purpose, but those who cling to them deviate from the mean, and thus dispute arose. This explains the first disputatious argument. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 64.33](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.64.33) - [Next: 64.35](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.64.35) - [Up: 64](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.64) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763~en-mt.64.34) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.64.34](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.64.34) · Pramāṇa