[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經集解](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763) › 64.6 # 大般涅槃經集解 64.6 大般涅槃經集解 64.6 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [64.6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.64.6) 案寶亮曰：凡列二十對四十家諍，請佛釋也。道慧記曰：迦葉發問凡有四十諍論，兩兩相對合為二十，就章門之中乃有四十二也。合章門中，第十九兩句言：或說佛性，即眾生有、離眾生有。或說四重五逆闡提，皆有佛性、或說言無。合此二句，所以為四十也。 > Baoliang comments: In total he lists twenty pairs and forty parties to the dispute, asking the Buddha to explain them. Daohui's records state: In Kāśyapa's question there are forty controversies in all; paired together two by two they make twenty, though within the chapter headings there are actually forty-two. In combining the chapter headings, the two clauses of the nineteenth state: "either explaining that the buddhadhātu exists immediately in sentient beings, or that it exists apart from sentient beings; or explaining that those who commit the four gravest offenses, the five heinous deeds, or are icchantikas all possess the buddhadhātu, or explaining that they do not." Combining these two clauses makes forty. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 64.5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.64.5) - [Next: 64.7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.64.7) - [Up: 64](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.64) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763~en-mt.64.6) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.64.6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.64.6) · Pramāṇa