[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經集解](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763) › 65.8 # 大般涅槃經集解 65.8 大般涅槃經集解 65.8 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [65.8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.65.8) 案僧亮曰：雖引四句，但取初句釋生惑之由也。不從緣生者，未與緣合也。從緣生非十二緣者，以不具十二，故言非也。寶亮曰：第二句云有十二緣不從緣生，謂未來世十二枝者，未來未起故言不從緣生耳；而或者謂常故不從緣生。此本據昔教為語也，然執者各偏言有為，無復相續，二家悉乖，故諍也。 > Sengliang comments: Although four propositions are cited, only the first proposition is taken to explain the origin of confusion. That which 'does not arise from conditions' has not yet combined with conditions. That which 'arises from conditions yet is not the twelve links' does not possess all twelve, hence it is said to be 'not'. Baoliang says: The second proposition states that there are twelve links not born from conditions, referring to the twelve branches of future lives; because the future has not yet arisen, it is said they are not born from conditions. But the confused think they are permanent and therefore not born from conditions. This originally spoke on the basis of past teachings. However, each adherent is biased: one says they are saṃskṛta without succession, and the other contradicts this; hence they dispute. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 65.7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.65.7) - [Next: 65.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.65.9) - [Up: 65](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.65) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763~en-mt.65.8) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.65.8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.65.8) · Pramāṇa