[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經集解](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763) › 67.14 # 大般涅槃經集解 67.14 大般涅槃經集解 67.14 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [67.14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.67.14) 案僧亮曰：若使乳酪二性是一者，則應互為因果也。僧宗曰：並責也。若使因中有果者，果中亦應有因也。智秀曰：第二難也。既云一時有，則同有也。 > Sengliang comments: If the two natures of milk and curd were one and the same, they ought to serve mutually as cause and effect. Sengzong says: He challenges both sides together. If an effect exists within the cause, a cause ought also to exist within the effect. Zhixiu says: This is the second objection. Since it is said that both exist at the same time, then they equally exist. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 67.13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.67.13) - [Next: 67.15](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.67.15) - [Up: 67](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.67) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763~en-mt.67.14) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.67.14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.67.14) · Pramāṇa