[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經集解](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763) › 7.70 # 大般涅槃經集解 7.70 大般涅槃經集解 7.70 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [7.70](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.7.70) 案僧亮曰：信佛是常，而請不肯住，以不自在。執昔說以致疑，乃取判於佛，此譬之旨也。法瑤曰：常理既顯，方知昔旨旨在於常，譬故在水下也。僧宗曰：唯有聞慧，未能入理，如未入水；未修勝慧，不名得珠。非不聞慧，義稱遙見耳。寶亮曰：既得信解，悉知常旨遍在昔日教之下。 > Sengliang states: Believing that the Buddha is permanent, yet when they begged him to stay, he would not, because he is unconstrained. Clinging to past teachings and giving rise to doubt, they then sought adjudication from the Buddha; this is the intent of this metaphor. Fayao states: Once the principle of permanence is revealed, they first know that the past intent lay in permanence, compared to it still being beneath the water. Sengzong states: Having only the wisdom of hearing, they are not yet able to enter into principle, like not having entered the water; not having cultivated superior wisdom, it is not called attaining the pearl. It is not that they lack the wisdom of hearing, which is metaphorically called seeing it from afar. Baoliang states: Having attained understanding through faith, they know entirely that the intent of permanence is ubiquitous beneath the teachings of the past. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 7.69](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.7.69) - [Next: 7.71](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.7.71) - [Up: 7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.7) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763~en-mt.7.70) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.7.70](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.7.70) · Pramāṇa