<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.70.31 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經集解](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763) › 70.31

# 大般涅槃經集解 70.31

大般涅槃經集解 70.31

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [70.31](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.70.31)

案僧亮曰：生親、了疏，因相以定，親不可疏、疏不可親。是因相不者，疏不生果，雖不能生果，故疏因之義即用了不。不也瞿曇！因果相同與不同，生因則同，了因不同也。寶亮曰：以此而言，不關論理，直是相折却耳。

> Sengliang states: "Generative is proximate, revealing is remote. The characteristics of causes are fixed: the proximate cannot be remote, and the remote cannot be proximate. 'Is this the characteristic of a cause?' Remote \[causes\] do not generate fruitions; although unable to generate fruitions, the meaning of a remote cause functions as revealing. 'No, Gautama!' As to whether cause and fruition have identical or different characteristics: with a generative cause they are identical, but with a revealing cause they are different." Baoliang states: "Judging by this, it is not concerned with debating principle, but simply aims to confound and refute him."  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 70.30](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.70.30)
- [Next: 70.32](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.70.32)
- [Up: 70](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.70)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763~en-mt.70.31) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.70.31](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.70.31) · Pramāṇa
