[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經集解](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763) › 70.53 # 大般涅槃經集解 70.53 大般涅槃經集解 70.53 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [70.53](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.70.53) 案僧亮曰：立義謂定有，不宜答也。是一是遍是作者，以三義證有也。作者是立義之本意，遍之與一證常耳。何者？不遍則有分，不一則有數。物有分數，是無常也。 > Sengliang states: He established a thesis asserting definite existence, so it was not appropriate to answer. 'It is one, it is all-pervading, it is the agent'—these use three meanings to prove its existence. 'Agent' is the fundamental intent of establishing the thesis, while 'all-pervading' and 'one' merely prove permanence. Why is this? If it were not all-pervading, it would have parts; if it were not one, it would have number. For things to have parts and number is impermanence. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 70.52](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.70.52) - [Next: 70.54](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.70.54) - [Up: 70](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.70) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763~en-mt.70.53) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.70.53](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.70.53) · Pramāṇa