<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.8.34 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經集解](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763) › 8.34

# 大般涅槃經集解 8.34

大般涅槃經集解 8.34

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [8.34](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.8.34)

案僧宗曰：向問般若，此問法身。上明無盡，此明不壞。如世金剛，體不可壞、能壞萬物。取譬法身，三相不能移其神、萬化莫能變其體也。寶亮曰：體相身命，實乃不殊；就義而辨，不得無異。身當法體，命語始終，故分為二問也。智秀曰：此第三問法身果也。

> Sengzong states: The previous asked about prajñā; this asks about the dharmakāya. The above clarified inexhaustibility; this clarifies indestructibility. Like worldly diamond (vajra), its substance cannot be destroyed, yet it can destroy all things. Drawing the analogy to the dharmakāya: the three marks cannot alter its spirit, and the myriad transformations cannot change its substance. Baoliang states: The substance, marks, body, and lifespan are in truth not different; yet discerning them according to meaning, they cannot lack distinction. The body corresponds to the substance of the Dharma, while life speaks of beginning and end; hence they are divided into two questions. Zhixiu states: This is the third question, on the fruition of the dharmakāya.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 8.33](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.8.33)
- [Next: 8.35](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.8.35)
- [Up: 8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.8)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763~en-mt.8.34) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.8.34](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.8.34) · Pramāṇa
