<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.9.6 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經集解](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763) › 9.6

# 大般涅槃經集解 9.6

大般涅槃經集解 9.6

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [9.6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.9.6)

案僧亮曰：此下第三答問分也。僧宗曰：此問總一經之宏致、收萬行之樞機，仰弘聖旨，故重稱善以讚也。爾問我答，照理是同，諸佛敷揚，何以異此，故曰等諸佛也。寶亮曰：迦葉之實未易可詳，以迹而取，豈議照與佛齊？既所問理玄，獨焉峯秀，為近見之徒須此歎耳。

> Sengliang states: Below this is the third section, the division of answering the questions. Sengzong states: This question summarizes the grand scope of the entire sūtra and collects the essential mechanism of the myriad practices; reverently expanding the sagely intent, he therefore repeats his praise of "excellent." When you ask and I answer, the illumination of the principle is identical; when all Buddhas proclaim it, how could it be different from this? Therefore it is said to be equal to all Buddhas. Baoliang states: The reality of Kāśyapa is not easily fathomed; judging by traces, how could one discuss his illumination being equal to the Buddha's? But since the principle he questioned is profound and uniquely stands out like a towering peak, for those of shortsighted view this praise is necessary.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 9.5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.9.5)
- [Next: 9.7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.9.7)
- [Up: 9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.9)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763~en-mt.9.6) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.9.6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1763.9.6) · Pramāṇa
