[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經義記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764) › 2.32 # 大般涅槃經義記 2.32 大般涅槃經義記 2.32 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.32](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.2.32) 第三乘言起過之中，初先起過，「如人醉」下自是非他。前起過者，起何等過？以佛嘆其有為法中善修無我，乘於佛地起無常等無為四倒，故名起過。比丘白佛「我等不但修無我想，亦更修習其餘想」者，不但於彼凡夫陰中修無我想，亦更於彼佛果陰中修無常苦、無我等想。然此正得名於佛地起無常苦、無我等想，不得名為無為法中起無常苦、無我等想。何故如是？若知無為，終不起於無常等倒。以何義故不說不淨？不淨事觀，故不論之。又於如來無漏法中，人多不取以為不淨，故不說之，理實具有。 > In the third part, producing an error on the basis of these words: first, they produce the error; from 'Like a drunk person' downward, they affirm themselves and fault others. As for the earlier producing of an error, what kind of error is produced? Because the Buddha praised their good cultivation of non-self among conditioned dharmas, they take this basis to produce the four unconditioned inversions of impermanence and so forth in the buddha-ground; hence it is called producing an error. When the monks say to the Buddha, 'We not only cultivate the conception of non-self, but also cultivate the other conceptions,' it means that not only do they cultivate the conception of non-self with regard to the aggregates of worldlings, but they also cultivate the conceptions of impermanence, suffering, non-self, and so on with regard to the aggregates of the buddha-fruit. However, this is strictly termed producing the conceptions of impermanence, suffering, non-self, and so on regarding the buddha-ground; it cannot be termed producing the conceptions of impermanence, suffering, non-self, and so on within unconditioned dharmas. Why is this so? If one knew the unconditioned, one would never produce inversions such as impermanence. For what reason is impurity not mentioned? Because impurity is a concrete contemplation of particulars, it is not discussed. Furthermore, within the Tathāgata's outflow-free dharmas, people generally do not grasp them as impure; hence it is not mentioned, although in principle it is truly present. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.31](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.2.31) - [Next: 2.33](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.2.33) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764~en-mt.2.32) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.2.32](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.2.32) · Pramāṇa