[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經義記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764) › 3.20 # 大般涅槃經義記 3.20 大般涅槃經義記 3.20 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [3.20](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.3.20) 問曰：下說「滅無常色獲得常色，受、想、行、識亦復如是。」云何說言佛無受樂？釋言：受中有其二種：一受境界違順等事、二證法相應攝受正法故名為受。今言無者，無其初受；下言得者，得其後受，兩言不違。後二可知。從上唯願重垂廣來。 > Question: Below it is stated, "Having eliminated impermanent form, one attains permanent form; feeling, perception, formations, and consciousness are also like this." Why is it said that the Buddha is without the pleasure of feeling? Explanation: Among feelings there are two kinds: first, feeling objects of sensory realms, whether adverse or agreeable; second, realizing the Dharma and concordantly taking in the true Dharma, which is therefore called "feeling." Now, when it is said to be "without," it is without the former feeling; below, when it is said to "attain," one attains the latter feeling, so the two statements do not conflict. The latter two are understandable. \[This completes the section\] from "We only pray that you will again condescend to explain broadly" above. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 3.19](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.3.19) - [Next: 3.21](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.3.21) - [Up: 3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.3) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764~en-mt.3.20) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.3.20](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.3.20) · Pramāṇa