<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.4.45 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經義記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764) › 4.45

# 大般涅槃經義記 4.45

大般涅槃經義記 4.45

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [4.45](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.4.45)

次破定無，先牒、次破。「乳中何故不生兔角」以無不生，顯生非無。是義云何？若乳無酪而得生酪，乳無兔角，何故不生？乳無兔角不可生角，乳生於酪明酪非無。「置毒乳中酪則殺人」以終驗始，顯非本無。「是故」下結。

> Next, it refutes definite non-existence, first citing and then refuting. 'Why are rabbit horns not produced in milk?' By the fact that what is non-existent is not produced, it reveals that what is produced is not non-existent. What is the meaning of this? If milk lacked cheese yet cheese could be produced, then since milk lacks rabbit horns, why are they not produced? Since milk lacks rabbit horns, horns cannot be produced; that milk produces cheese shows that cheese is not non-existent. 'If poison is placed in milk, the cheese kills people' verifies the beginning by the end, revealing that it is not inherently non-existent. From 'therefore' downward is the conclusion.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 4.44](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.4.44)
- [Next: 4.46](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.4.46)
- [Up: 4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.4)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764~en-mt.4.45) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.4.45](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.4.45) · Pramāṇa
