<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.4.51 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經義記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764) › 4.51

# 大般涅槃經義記 4.51

大般涅槃經義記 4.51

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [4.51](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.4.51)

第四段中，「是故不得定言乳中無有酪相」正明無二，是酪從於乳中生故，不得定言乳中無酪相，而生後酪，故性無二。「從他生者，離乳而有無有是處」破他定二。從他生者，舉異見人；離乳而有，舉異見言；無有是處，以理正非。離乳有酪無是處故，明非定二。

> In the fourth section, 'therefore one cannot definitely say that within milk there is no characteristic of cheese' properly explains non-duality. Because this cheese is produced from within milk, one cannot definitely say that within milk there is no characteristic of cheese, yet it produces subsequent cheese; therefore their nature is non-dual. 'If it originated from another, that it exists apart from milk is impossible' refutes the other's fixed duality. 'Those originating from another' cites the proponent of divergent views; 'existing apart from milk' cites the assertion of the divergent view; 'is impossible' properly negates it through principle. Because it is impossible for cheese to exist apart from milk, it shows that it is not fixedly two.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 4.50](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.4.50)
- [Next: 4.52](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.4.52)
- [Up: 4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.4)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764~en-mt.4.51) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.4.51](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.4.51) · Pramāṇa
