<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.4.9 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經義記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764) › 4.9

# 大般涅槃經義記 4.9

大般涅槃經義記 4.9

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [4.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.4.9)

下明二見起之所由，由常起斷、由斷起常。於中，初法、次喻、後合。法中，「修常墮斷見」者，求常不得，故生斷見；「修一切斷」，前常見者求斷不得，故生常見。喻中，「因前移後足」者，斷、常二見互為前後。合文可知。

> Below, it clarifies the origin from which the two views arise: from permanence arises annihilation, and from annihilation arises permanence. Therein, first is the doctrine, next the metaphor, and last the application. In the doctrine, 'cultivating permanence falls into the view of annihilation' means that seeking permanence and failing to obtain it, one gives rise to the view of annihilation; 'cultivating all annihilation' means that the former holder of the view of permanence seeks annihilation and fails to obtain it, and therefore gives rise to the view of permanence. In the metaphor, 'moving the rear foot based on the front' means that the two views of annihilation and permanence alternate as prior and posterior. The application text can be understood.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 4.8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.4.8)
- [Next: 4.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.4.10)
- [Up: 4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.4)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764~en-mt.4.9) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.4.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.4.9) · Pramāṇa
