[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經義記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764) › 5.9 # 大般涅槃經義記 5.9 大般涅槃經義記 5.9 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [5.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.5.9) 問曰：若彼是病行者，何故在於〈梵行品〉說？釋言：一品備論多法，諸經同有，不足可怪。又問：若彼兼論病行，何故偏名〈梵行品〉乎？此例亦多，如上〈如來性品〉中具明多法，題章偏名〈如來性品〉，此亦似彼，但經立品差別種種，或有從初、或復就後、或有據中、或復當相，非可一定。 > Question: If that is illness practice, why is it spoken of in the 'Brahmacaryā Practice Chapter'? Answer: A single chapter fully discussing many dharmas is common to all sūtras, and is nothing to wonder at. Another question: If it also discusses illness practice, why is it exclusively named the 'Brahmacaryā Practice Chapter'? Examples of this are also numerous; just as the 'Tathāgata-Nature Chapter' above fully explains many dharmas, yet the chapter title is exclusively named 'Tathāgata-Nature Chapter', this is also similar to that. The establishment of chapters in sūtras has various differences: some take their name from the beginning, some from the end, some based on the middle, and some according to their predominant characteristic; it cannot be fixed. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 5.8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.5.8) - [Next: 5.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.5.10) - [Up: 5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.5) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764~en-mt.5.9) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.5.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.5.9) · Pramāṇa