[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經義記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764) › 6.27 # 大般涅槃經義記 6.27 大般涅槃經義記 6.27 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [6.27](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.6.27) 唯此三文有六句：一明此空中無苦、無常、不淨、無我有為之法，「所謂」已下少一「無」字，若具，應言謂無無常、苦、無我等；二明此空中無陰界入內、外之事；三明此空中無眾生、壽命，此正所空；四重就初句明無有為、有漏之法；五重就第二明無一切內、外之事；六明此空中無佛、法、僧及與佛性，「佛等四法非是有為亦非無為」略以標舉，「性善」下釋性是善故非無為者，就無為中虛空非數滅，體是無記，佛等是善，故不在中之無為中，世俗等智斷結數滅，體雖是善，以麁淺故，佛等不同，如此之義今略不論。常非有為，理在易知，是中正應明非無為，有為是其無為家對，乘以論之。 > Only these three passages have six phrases: first, clarifying that within this emptiness there are no conditioned dharmas of suffering, impermanence, impurity, and non-self—from 'namely' below it lacks the character 'without' (無); if complete, it should say 'namely without impermanence, suffering, non-self, and so forth'; second, clarifying that within this emptiness there are no internal or external affairs of aggregates, realms, and entrances; third, clarifying that within this emptiness there are no sentient beings or life-spans, which are precisely what is emptied; fourth, again in terms of the first phrase clarifying the absence of conditioned and defiled dharmas; fifth, again in terms of the second clarifying the absence of all internal and external affairs; sixth, clarifying that within this emptiness there are no Buddha, Dharma, Saṅgha, or buddha-nature—'the four dharmas such as the Buddha are neither conditioned nor unconditioned' briefly marks it out; from 'nature is wholesome' below explains that because their nature is wholesome they are not unconditioned. In terms of the unconditioned, space and non-analytical cessation are indeterminate in substance, whereas the Buddha and so forth are wholesome, hence they are not among them; among analytical cessations through cutting defilements by worldly wisdom and so forth, although their substance is wholesome, because they are coarse and shallow, the Buddha and so forth are not identical with them—such meanings are now briefly not discussed. That the permanent is not conditioned is readily known in principle; herein one should properly clarify that they are not unconditioned, and conditioned is the counterpart of the unconditioned, discussed by association. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 6.26](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.6.26) - [Next: 6.28](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.6.28) - [Up: 6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.6) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764~en-mt.6.27) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.6.27](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.6.27) · Pramāṇa