[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經義記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764) › 6.30 # 大般涅槃經義記 6.30 大般涅槃經義記 6.30 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [6.30](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.6.30) 問曰：向前六空之中並簡如來、法、僧、佛性，此性空中何故不然？釋言：今此通就報果常、樂、我、淨以明性空，常樂我淨是佛、法、僧，所以不簡。又，佛常、樂、我、淨報果通亦名性，以是義故，相不簡佛性。下餘空中不簡例然。 > Question: In the preceding six emptinesses, the Tathāgata, Dharma, Saṅgha, and buddha-nature were all excluded; why is that not the case here in this emptiness of intrinsic nature? Explanation: Here, emptiness of intrinsic nature is explained comprehensively in terms of the retributive fruition of permanence, bliss, self, and purity; permanence, bliss, self, and purity are the Buddha, Dharma, and Saṅgha, which is why they are not excluded. Furthermore, the Buddha's retributive fruition of permanence, bliss, self, and purity is also broadly termed "nature"; for this reason, in terms of marks, buddha-nature is not excluded. That they are not excluded in the remaining emptinesses below follows this same pattern. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 6.29](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.6.29) - [Next: 6.31](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.6.31) - [Up: 6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.6) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764~en-mt.6.30) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.6.30](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.6.30) · Pramāṇa