[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經義記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764) › 9.7 # 大般涅槃經義記 9.7 大般涅槃經義記 9.7 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [9.7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.9.7) 下就五陰破定有我。文別有四：一破其邪、二顯其正、三復破邪、四復顯正。初中，先就色陰以破，類其餘四。就色陰中，初先破我，後破常等。就破我中，「若色是我，是亦不然」舉以總非。「何以故」下廣顯其非，五句破之。「若色是我，不應醜陋」是一破也；「何故復有四姓差別」是二破也；「何故屬他」是三破也；「諸根缺漏」是四破也；「何不作天受地獄」等是五破也。「若不能」下總以結破。下破常等并類餘陰，文皆可知。上來破邪，「如來永」下顯示正義，「復次色」下重復破邪，「如來身」下重顯王義。 > Below, in reference to the five aggregates, he refutes a definitely existing self. The text specifically has four parts: first, refuting their heterodoxy; second, revealing the orthodox; third, again refuting the heterodoxy; fourth, again revealing the orthodox. In the first part, he first refutes it in reference to the aggregate of form, and analogizes the remaining four. Within the aggregate of form, he first refutes the self, and afterward refutes permanence, etc. Within the refutation of the self, "If form is the self, this is also not so" cites it to negate it generally. From "Why?" downward, he extensively reveals its error, refuting it with five clauses: "If form is the self, it should not be ugly" is the first refutation; "Why are there furthermore the distinctions of the four castes?" is the second refutation; "Why does it belong to another?" is the third refutation; "having deficient and impaired sense faculties" is the fourth refutation; "Why does it not become a deva, rather than experiencing the hells, etc.?" is the fifth refutation. From "If it cannot" downward, he concludes the refutation generally. Below, refuting permanence, etc., and analogizing the remaining aggregates can all be understood from the text. The above refuted the heterodox; from "The Tathāgata eternally" downward displays the orthodox meaning; from "Furthermore, form" downward refutes the heterodox again; from "The Tathāgata's body" downward displays the sovereign meaning again. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 9.6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.9.6) - [Next: 9.8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.9.8) - [Up: 9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.9) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764~en-mt.9.7) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.9.7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1764.9.7) · Pramāṇa