[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大般涅槃經疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1767) › 11.7 # 大般涅槃經疏 11.7 大般涅槃經疏 11.7 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [11.7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1767.11.7) 「迦葉白佛」去，是第三論義。文有三番：一論佛性、二論過人、三論夢覺。初番先問（云云）。次答中如來或說我或說無我是名中道者，《中論》云「諸法實相中，無我非無我。」我無我皆是假名。言我是假，言無我是實，非我非無我即是中道。次第二番問答，先問、次答。答中先明犯，次明不犯，後重明犯如文（云云）。第三番問答中二，先問次答。夢淫無罪，寤已應悔，若寤已贊歎得罪，《大品》中意亦爾（云云）。摩訶楞伽，此云赤色，與下文被服赤色相違，云何通？解云：下文說未制戒時，此中說制戒後。又一解：赤亦多種，大赤則遮，如乾陀；輕赤此則不遮（云云）。 > From "Kāśyapa addressed the Buddha" onward is the third part, debating the meanings. The text has three rounds: first, discussing the buddhadhātu; second, discussing exceeding human conditions; third, discussing dreaming and waking. In the first round, he first asks, and so forth. In the subsequent reply, that the Tathāgata sometimes speaks of self and sometimes speaks of non-self is termed the middle way. The \*Madhyamaka-śāstra\* states: "Within the dharmatā of all phenomena, there is neither self nor non-self." Both self and non-self are conventional designations. Saying "self" is conventional; saying "non-self" is real; neither self nor non-self is the middle way. Next is the second round of questions and answers: first the question, then the reply. In the reply, it first clarifies transgression, next clarifies non-transgression, and later re-clarifies transgression, as in the text, and so forth. In the third round of questions and answers there are two parts: first the question, then the reply. Sexual intercourse in a dream incurs no offense, but upon waking one should repent; if upon waking one praises it, one incurs an offense. The meaning in the \*Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā-prajñāpāramitā\* is also like this, and so forth. \*Mahālaṅkā\*, translated here as "red color," contradicts the subsequent text's "wearing red garments"; how is this reconciled? It is explained: the subsequent text speaks of the time before the precepts were established, whereas here it speaks of the time after the precepts were established. Another explanation: red also has many shades; a deep red is prohibited, like \*gandha\*; a light red is not prohibited, and so forth. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 11.6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1767.11.6) - [Next: 11.8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1767.11.8) - [Up: 11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1767.11) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1767~en-mt.11.7) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1767.11.7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1767.11.7) · Pramāṇa