<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1775.2.348 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [注維摩詰經](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1775) › 2.348

# 注維摩詰經 2.348

注維摩詰經 2.348

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [2.348](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1775.2.348)

什曰：迦葉自謂滅生死能為福田，故以不然明無所滅，以遣其所謂也。肇曰：如火有然，故有滅耳。法性常空，本自無起，今何所滅？猶釋意所對法也。生曰：從他生故無自性也。既無自性，豈有他性哉？然則本自不然，何有滅乎？故如幻。

> \[Kumāra\]jīva says: Kāśyapa considered that extinguishing saṃsāra could serve as a field of merit; therefore, by 'not burning', \[Vimalakīrti\] clarified that there is nothing to be extinguished, dispelling what he held. \[Seng\]zhao says: Just as fire burns, so there is extinction. The Dharma-nature is constantly empty, fundamentally without arising; what is there now to extinguish? This still explains the dharmas he confronted in mind. \[Dao\]sheng says: Arising from other, it has no self-nature. Since it has no self-nature, how could it have other-nature? Thus, fundamentally not burning, how could there be extinction? Therefore, they are like illusions.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 2.347](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1775.2.347)
- [Next: 2.349](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1775.2.349)
- [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1775.2)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1775~en-mt.2.348) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1775.2.348](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1775.2.348) · Pramāṇa
