<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1775.5.80 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [注維摩詰經](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1775) › 5.80

# 注維摩詰經 5.80

注維摩詰經 5.80

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [5.80](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1775.5.80)

什曰：問解空慧也。向雖明空慧不見空有分別，未明慧體空無分別，故問此空慧可分別耶？肇曰：上以無分別為慧空，故知法空無復異空。雖云無異而異相已形，異相已形則分別是生矣。若知法無異空者，何由云以無分別為智空故知法空乎？故問智空法空可分別耶？智法俱空，故單言一空則滿足矣。生曰：即空之言，空似有相，有相便與餘事分別也。空苟分別而慧不分別者，則空與慧異矣。空既異慧，復不從慧來也。

> \[Kumāra\]jīva says: He is inquiring about the wisdom that understands emptiness. Although earlier it was explained that empty wisdom sees neither emptiness nor existence with discrimination, it had not yet clarified that the substance of wisdom is empty and devoid of discrimination. Therefore he asks: Can this empty wisdom be discriminated?  
> \[Seng\]zhao says: Above, taking non-discrimination as the emptiness of wisdom, it was known that the emptiness of dharmas has no further separate emptiness. Although it is said there is no difference, the characteristic of difference has already taken shape; and once the characteristic of difference has taken shape, discrimination arises. If one knows that dharmas have no separate emptiness, why say: "Because non-discrimination is the emptiness of wisdom, one knows the emptiness of dharmas"? Therefore he asks: Can the emptiness of wisdom and the emptiness of dharmas be discriminated? Since wisdom and dharmas are both empty, speaking simply of a single emptiness is entirely sufficient.  
> \[Dao\]sheng says: Following the word "emptiness", emptiness seems to have characteristics; if it has characteristics, it is discriminated from other things. If emptiness were indeed discriminated while wisdom were not, then emptiness and wisdom would be different. Once emptiness is different from wisdom, moreover, it would not derive from wisdom.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 5.79](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1775.5.79)
- [Next: 5.81](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1775.5.81)
- [Up: 5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1775.5)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1775~en-mt.5.80) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1775.5.80](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1775.5.80) · Pramāṇa
