[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [注維摩詰經](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1775) › 6.262 # 注維摩詰經 6.262 注維摩詰經 6.262 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [6.262](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1775.6.262) 什曰：若見有得證則情有所封，有所封則有所閡，有閡則無辯。以無得證，故能若是也。肇曰：夫有閡之道不能生無閡之辯，無閡之辯必出于無閡之道。道有得有證者，必有所不得有所不證。以大乘之道無得無證，故無所不得無所不證。從此生辨，故無所不辨也。生曰：無得為得、無證為證，故辨如是也。 > \[Kumāra\]jīva says: If one sees attainment and realization, then the mind is bounded; being bounded, there is obstruction; with obstruction, there is no eloquence. Because of having no attainment or realization, she can be like this. \[Seng\]zhao says: A path with obstruction cannot give rise to unobstructed eloquence; unobstructed eloquence must emerge from the unobstructed path. If a path has attainment and realization, there must be something not attained and something not realized. Because the path of the Mahāyāna has nothing attained and nothing realized, there is nothing not attained and nothing not realized. Generating eloquence from this, there is nothing it does not articulate. \[Dao\]sheng says: Having no attainment is attainment, and having no realization is realization; therefore her eloquence is like this. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 6.261](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1775.6.261) - [Next: 6.263](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1775.6.263) - [Up: 6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1775.6) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1775~en-mt.6.262) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1775.6.262](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1775.6.262) · Pramāṇa