[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [維摩義記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1776) › 4.13 # 維摩義記 4.13 維摩義記 4.13 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [4.13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1776.4.13) 二十七中，初「德藏曰」，標人別說。下明所說。「有所得二」，反舉二相。造作善惡得苦樂報名為所得，所得之中苦樂等異名之為二。下翻此二以明不二，二相雙遣為不二矣。先辨、後結。「若無所得無取捨」者，於第一義所得本無，無所得故無樂可取、無苦可捨。「無取捨者」，牒以結之。 > In the twenty-seventh \[statement\], first, "Guṇagarbha said" indicates the person who speaks separately. Below, what he said is clarified. "'Having acquisition is two'" points back to the signs of duality. Creating wholesome and unwholesome deeds and obtaining retributions of suffering and pleasure is called "acquisition"; within what is acquired, differences such as suffering and pleasure are called "two." Below, he overturns these two to clarify nonduality, where the double elimination of the two signs constitutes nonduality. First he differentiates, and then he concludes. As for "if there is no acquisition, there is no grasping or abandoning," in the supreme meaning, acquisition is originally nonexistent; because there is no acquisition, there is no pleasure to grasp and no suffering to abandon. "One without grasping or abandoning" takes this up to conclude. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 4.12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1776.4.12) - [Next: 4.14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1776.4.14) - [Up: 4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1776.4) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1776~en-mt.4.13) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1776.4.13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1776.4.13) · Pramāṇa