<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1776.4.75 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [維摩義記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1776) › 4.75

# 維摩義記 4.75

維摩義記 4.75

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [4.75](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1776.4.75)

問曰：佛常可非有為無為應好，何故非乎？釋言：據實有為本無，知復對何說為無為？故亦非之。

> Question: Since the Buddha is eternal, it would be fine for him not to be conditioned; why is he also negated as unconditioned? Answer: In reality, the conditioned is fundamentally nonexistent; in contrast to what could one speak of the unconditioned? Therefore it is also negated.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 4.74](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1776.4.74)
- [Next: 4.76](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1776.4.76)
- [Up: 4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1776.4)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1776~en-mt.4.75) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1776.4.75](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1776.4.75) · Pramāṇa
