[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [維摩經玄疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1777) › 2.94 # 維摩經玄疏 2.94 維摩經玄疏 2.94 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.94](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1777.2.94) 次觀無相三昧者，即觀無生實相，非有相，不如闇室瓶、盆之有相也；非無相，非如乳內無酪性也；非亦有亦無相，不如智者見空及不空；非非有、非非無相，取著即是愚癡論。若不取四邊之定相，即是無相三昧入實相也。若爾，豈全同地論師用「本有佛性，如闇室瓶、盆」？亦不全同三論師破「乳中酪性，畢竟盡淨，無所有性」也！ > Next, regarding the contemplation of the signless samādhi: one contemplates the unarisen true mark as not having signs, unlike the existence of signs of jars and basins in a dark room; as not lacking signs, unlike the absence of the nature of curd within milk; as neither having signs nor lacking signs, unlike the wise seeing emptiness and non-emptiness; and as not neither having signs nor lacking signs, for grasping and attaching to that is the talk of foolishness. If one does not grasp fixed signs of the four extremes, this is using the signless samādhi to enter the true mark. If so, how could it be wholly identical to the Dilun masters who use 'inherently existing buddha-nature, like jars and basins in a dark room'? Nor is it wholly identical to the Sanlun masters who refute 'the nature of curd in milk as being completely and thoroughly cleared away, having no nature at all'! > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.93](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1777.2.93) - [Next: 2.95](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1777.2.95) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1777.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1777~en-mt.2.94) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1777.2.94](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1777.2.94) · Pramāṇa