<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1777.4.46 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [維摩經玄疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1777) › 4.46

# 維摩經玄疏 4.46

維摩經玄疏 4.46

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [4.46](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1777.4.46)

問曰：若爾四教明果，可分權實；四教因地皆有教有人，何得分其權、實？

> Question: If so, regarding the four teachings' explanation of the fruit, one can divide them into provisional and ultimate. If on the causal ground of the four teachings there are both the teaching and the person, how can one divide them into provisional and ultimate?  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 4.45](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1777.4.45)
- [Next: 4.47](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1777.4.47)
- [Up: 4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1777.4)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1777~en-mt.4.46) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1777.4.46](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1777.4.46) · Pramāṇa
