[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [維摩經玄疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1777) › 5.143 # 維摩經玄疏 5.143 維摩經玄疏 5.143 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [5.143](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1777.5.143) 問曰：若明三種解脫類通三種般若，何得復用三種解脫類通三種涅槃？般若是因名，涅槃是果稱，是則因果混亂之過耶？ > Question: If one explains the three kinds of liberation as analogously correlating with the three kinds of prajñā, how can one also use the three kinds of liberation to analogously correlate with the three kinds of nirvāṇa? Prajñā is a designation for the cause, and nirvāṇa is a name for the fruition; is this not the fault of confusing cause and fruition? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 5.142](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1777.5.142) - [Next: 5.144](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1777.5.144) - [Up: 5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1777.5) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1777~en-mt.5.143) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1777.5.143](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1777.5.143) · Pramāṇa