<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1777.6.6 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [維摩經玄疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1777) › 6.6

# 維摩經玄疏 6.6

維摩經玄疏 6.6

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [6.6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1777.6.6)

問曰：上說真諦即是思議解脫之理，今何故說真實之性即是不思議解脫之理？

> Question: Above it was said that the truth of the real is precisely the principle of conceivable liberation. Why do you now say that the real nature is precisely the principle of inconceivable liberation?  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 6.5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1777.6.5)
- [Next: 6.7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1777.6.7)
- [Up: 6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1777.6)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1777~en-mt.6.6) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1777.6.6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1777.6.6) · Pramāṇa
