[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [維摩經略疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1778) › 2.53 # 維摩經略疏 2.53 維摩經略疏 2.53 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.53](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1778.2.53) 問：上多約三諦，今何得用二諦歎也？答：合真入中、合真入俗，通別二諦，玄文料簡。又解：若隨情辨真即是權智分別法相，若隨智之真即是實智寂而常照，是故歎言於第一義而不動也。 > Question: Above, the explanation was mostly in terms of the three truths; why is praise now given using the two truths? Answer: Combining the true into the middle, or combining the true into the conventional—the shared and separate two truths are analyzed in the Profound Meaning. Another explanation: if distinguishing the true according with feelings, that is provisional wisdom distinguishing the characteristics of dharmas; if it is the true according with wisdom, that is real wisdom tranquil yet constantly illuminating; therefore the praise says, "in the primary truth, remaining unmoved." > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.52](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1778.2.52) - [Next: 2.54](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1778.2.54) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1778.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1778~en-mt.2.53) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1778.2.53](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1778.2.53) · Pramāṇa