[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [維摩經略疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1778) › 6.15 # 維摩經略疏 6.15 維摩經略疏 6.15 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [6.15](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1778.6.15) 問：何以三教但破，釋但用圓？答：破為破執釋成實義。前教無人無行，教破皆無。圓教執破即教，人行宛然，故正約圓。此結釋真修如不生，即無智德，故不得記。 > Question: Why is it that the three teachings are only refuted, while the explanation only employs the Perfect? Answer: Refutation is to shatter attachment; explanation is to establish the true meaning. In the former teachings there is no person and no practice; when the teachings are refuted, all are absent. In the Perfect Teaching, once attachment is shattered, the teaching, person, and practice are fully manifest; therefore, it is properly in terms of the Perfect. This concluding explanation states that when the suchness of true cultivation does not arise, there is no virtue of wisdom; therefore, prophecy is not received. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 6.14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1778.6.14) - [Next: 6.16](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1778.6.16) - [Up: 6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1778.6) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1778~en-mt.6.15) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1778.6.15](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1778.6.15) · Pramāṇa