[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [維摩經略疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1778) › 8.42 # 維摩經略疏 8.42 維摩經略疏 8.42 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [8.42](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1778.8.42) 問：無住有住有開合不？答：若合無明祇是法性，法性無住、無明無住，故言無住。若開法性出無明，無明依法性，亦得言有住。有住者住法性，住法性非煩惱，即是無住。而約無明明修無量四聖諦論斷伏者，此是別教就界外明五住義也。 > Question: Does non-abiding and having an abiding have an opening and combining? Answer: If combined, ignorance is simply the dharma-nature: the dharma-nature is non-abiding and ignorance is non-abiding; hence it is called non-abiding. If one opens the dharma-nature to bring forth ignorance, ignorance relies upon the dharma-nature, so one can also say it has an abiding. Having an abiding means abiding in the dharma-nature; abiding in the dharma-nature is not an affliction, so it is precisely non-abiding. Yet explaining the cultivation of the measureless four noble truths with respect to ignorance to discuss severance and suppression—this is the Separate Teaching clarifying the meaning of the five entrenchments with respect to what is beyond the realm. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 8.41](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1778.8.41) - [Next: 8.43](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1778.8.43) - [Up: 8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1778.8) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1778~en-mt.8.42) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1778.8.42](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1778.8.42) · Pramāṇa