[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [維摩經略疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1778) › 9.9 # 維摩經略疏 9.9 維摩經略疏 9.9 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [9.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1778.9.9) 問：若佛性有三，種亦三不？答：如所問。故此品文殊言「有身為種」，六入為種即苦道正因種性之異名也。「無明貪恚等為種」，即煩惱道了因種性之異名。「十不善為種」，即業道緣因種性之異名也。種性之與性，義實相映，故《法華》云「唯有如來知此眾生種相體性」，即其義也。 > Question: If buddha-nature has three kinds, are seeds also threefold? Answer: It is as you have asked. Therefore, in this chapter Mañjuśrī states, "Having a body is the seed"; the six sense bases being the seed is a different designation for the direct-cause seed-nature of the path of suffering. "Ignorance, greed, and anger are the seed" is a different designation for the revealing-cause seed-nature of the path of afflictions. "The ten unwholesome actions are the seed" is a different designation for the contributory-cause seed-nature of the path of karma. Seed-nature and nature genuinely reflect one another in meaning; hence the Lotus Sūtra says: "Only the Tathāgata knows the seeds, marks, essences, and natures of these living beings," which is precisely this meaning. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 9.8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1778.9.8) - [Next: 9.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1778.9.10) - [Up: 9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1778.9) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1778~en-mt.9.9) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1778.9.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1778.9.9) · Pramāṇa