[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [維摩經略疏垂裕記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779) › 1.48 # 維摩經略疏垂裕記 1.48 維摩經略疏垂裕記 1.48 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.48](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.1.48) 二、荊溪自序，二：初、題目。此既自序，不應安著述人號，如孔安國傳《尚書》、杜元愷集解《春秋》、何晏集解《論語》，並自作敘引而皆不書其名。以荊溪之博識，蓋取則於前修，所以古本皆無作者之號。今本或有者，後人妄加也。 > Second, Jingxi's own preface, in two parts: first, the title. Since this is his own preface, the author's title should not be placed \[here\]. For example, Kong Anguo's commentary on the Shangshu, Du Yuankai's Collected Commentaries on the Chunqiu, and He Yan's Collected Explanations of the Lunyu all composed their own prefaces and introductions without writing their names. With Jingxi's broad erudition, he was taking the ancient masters as his model; thus, none of the ancient editions contained the author's name. Where current editions sometimes have it, it was erroneously added by later hands. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.47](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.1.47) - [Next: 1.49](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.1.49) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779~en-mt.1.48) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.1.48](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.1.48) · Pramāṇa