[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [維摩經略疏垂裕記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779) › 1.66 # 維摩經略疏垂裕記 1.66 維摩經略疏垂裕記 1.66 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.66](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.1.66) 二、約名重徵，二：初、問意者，華嚴題下無不思議號，今經題下顯有其名，何故反謂《釋論》所指不思議經非今經耶？ > Second, raising the inquiry again in terms of name has two parts: first, the meaning of the question is: beneath the title of the Huayan there is no designation of "Inconceivable", whereas beneath the title of the present scripture that name is explicitly present; why on the contrary is it asserted that the Inconceivable Sūtra pointed to by the Commentary (Dazhidulun) is not the present scripture? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.65](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.1.65) - [Next: 1.67](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.1.67) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779~en-mt.1.66) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.1.66](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.1.66) · Pramāṇa