[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [維摩經略疏垂裕記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779) › 3.136 # 維摩經略疏垂裕記 3.136 維摩經略疏垂裕記 3.136 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [3.136](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.3.136) 問：若爾，何故前釋直心等文而皆具五？世直尚成菩薩之行，三藏何失，云無行耶？答：從本則有，據迹說無。有教無人良可信矣。 > Question: If so, why did the previous explanation of the straight mind and subsequent texts all possess the five? Even worldly straightforwardness still constitutes a bodhisattva practice; what flaw is there in the Tripiṭaka that it is said to have no practice? Answer: In terms of the fundamental, it exists; based on the traces, it is said not to exist. That there is teaching but no person is truly credible. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 3.135](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.3.135) - [Next: 3.137](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.3.137) - [Up: 3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.3) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779~en-mt.3.136) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.3.136](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.3.136) · Pramāṇa