[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [維摩經略疏垂裕記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779) › 3.22 # 維摩經略疏垂裕記 3.22 維摩經略疏垂裕記 3.22 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [3.22](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.3.22) 二、引《瓔珞》斥謬。「集八禪眾」者，即自性禪乃至此世他世禪，即是集地前地上菩薩也。「昔在華嚴」等者，荊溪云：所言昔者，一家五時皆有結教。以《瓔珞經》結諸方等，故指《華嚴》以之為昔，猶隔鹿苑。《瓔珞》在後，道理必然。故知他釋非但八禪不成，昔義未允。 > Second, citing the \*Yingluo \[jing\]\* to refute error. As for "gathering the assembly of the eight dhyānas," this refers to the intrinsic-nature dhyāna up to the dhyāna of bliss in this world and other worlds, which means gathering the bodhisattvas before and on the bhūmis. As for "formerly in the \*Avataṃsaka\*," and so forth, Jingxi says: Regarding the word "formerly," our school's five periods all have concluding teachings. Because the \*Yingluo jing\* concludes the various Vaipulya \[sūtras\], it points to the \*Avataṃsaka\* as "formerly," still separated by the Deer Park. The \*Yingluo\* comes later, which is necessarily the case in principle. Therefore, we know that other explanations not only fail regarding the eight dhyānas, but their meaning of "formerly" is also inappropriate. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 3.21](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.3.21) - [Next: 3.23](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.3.23) - [Up: 3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.3) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779~en-mt.3.22) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.3.22](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.3.22) · Pramāṇa