<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.3.36 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [維摩經略疏垂裕記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779) › 3.36

# 維摩經略疏垂裕記 3.36

維摩經略疏垂裕記 3.36

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [3.36](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.3.36)

二、料簡，二：初、對二諦簡。荊溪云：上用二諦等者，指上善能分別等文。智既照諦，說必依智，何得前後二三不同？答意如前。二、對邪小簡。荊溪云：外道等者，欲簡諸教眾多雙非顯圓雙非，故設斯問。答中具答雙非不一。

> Second, distinguishing and resolving, \[which has\] two \[parts\]: First, distinguishing in contrast to the two truths. Jingxi says: Regarding "Above, the two truths were used" and so forth: this refers to the above text on "skilfully able to distinguish" and so on. Since wisdom illuminates the truths, preaching must rely on wisdom; how could the earlier and later \[passages\] differ between two and three? The meaning of the reply is as before. Second, distinguishing in contrast to heterodox and lesser \[teachings\]. Jingxi says: Regarding "The heterodox" and so forth: in order to distinguish the numerous double negations of the various teachings and reveal the double negation of the perfect \[teaching\], this question was raised. In the reply, it fully answers that the double negations are not uniform.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 3.35](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.3.35)
- [Next: 3.37](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.3.37)
- [Up: 3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.3)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779~en-mt.3.36) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.3.36](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.3.36) · Pramāṇa
