<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.6.129 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [維摩經略疏垂裕記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779) › 6.129

# 維摩經略疏垂裕記 6.129

維摩經略疏垂裕記 6.129

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [6.129](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.6.129)

二、上首為說。「依律判斷」者，若犯根本，應須學悔；若犯方便，應懺偷蘭；若本無心則不結罪。「或教」下，謂問其情實。若本有心應須懺滅，正罪方便並須集僧。若犯重者，《僧祇》云「若犯罪已，啼哭不欲離袈裟深樂佛法者，令與學悔羯磨，然後奪三十五事等。」若犯蘭者，《十誦》云「初篇生重，此是近方便，謂身口相加未得暢遂者，應一切僧中悔。若初篇生輕二篇生重，應界外四比丘中悔。若僧殘生輕，應一比丘前悔。」是則集僧有界內界外二種之別，羯磨分心念、對首、眾法三類之殊。今此明悔罪，用眾法、對首也。故荊溪云：集僧唯二，羯磨通三，滅與不滅如常所辨。波離為彼犯者如上律相而說，故云為其如法解說也。

> Second, the senior leader expounding for them. As for "Judging in accordance with the Vinaya," if they violated a fundamental \[precept\], they ought to practice repentance; if they violated a preliminary stage, they ought to repent of the \*sthūlātyaya\*; if originally there was no intention, it does not constitute a transgression. In "Or teaching..." below, it means questioning their actual state of mind. If originally there was intention, it must be confessed and extinguished; for both the primary offense and preliminary stages, the Saṅgha must be assembled. If one violates a heavy \[precept\], the \*Mahāsāṃghika Vinaya\* says, "If, having committed an offense, one weeps, does not wish to depart from the kāṣāya, and deeply delights in the Buddha-Dharma, they should be granted the karman of practicing repentance, and then thirty-five matters should be stripped from them, etc." If one violates a \*sthūlātyaya\*, the \*Ten-Recitation Vinaya\* says, "When a heavy offense arises in the first class \[pārājika\], this is a proximate preliminary stage—meaning body and speech were applied but not yet fully consummated—one should repent among the entire Saṅgha. If a light offense arises in the first class or a heavy offense arises in the second class \[saṅghāvaśeṣa\], one should repent among four monks outside the boundary. If a light offense arises in the saṅghāvaśeṣa class, one should repent before a single monk." Thus, assembling the Saṅgha has two distinct kinds: within the boundary and outside the boundary; and karman is divided into three kinds: mental resolution, face-to-face \[with another monk\], and by the Saṅgha assembly. Here, to clarify repenting offenses, the Saṅgha assembly and face-to-face types are used. Therefore Jingxi says: Assembling the Saṅgha is only of two kinds; karman applies to all three; whether extinguished or not is distinguished as usual. Upāli expounded for those offenders according to the Vinaya characteristics described above; hence it says he explained it for them according to the Dharma.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 6.128](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.6.128)
- [Next: 6.130](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.6.130)
- [Up: 6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.6)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779~en-mt.6.129) — English, machine translation

## Linked texts (1)

- [四分律刪繁補闕行事鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1804.2.504) — Classical Chinese

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.6.129](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.6.129) · Pramāṇa
