[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [維摩經略疏垂裕記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779) › 6.52 # 維摩經略疏垂裕記 6.52 維摩經略疏垂裕記 6.52 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [6.52](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.6.52) 二、折同塵勞。「汝亦具有故言等也」者，荊溪云：八萬等言通於大小。故《俱舍》云「牟尼說法蘊，數有八十千。」乃至如《報恩經》列多八萬，此等皆是界內八萬。如對四分，一分各有二萬一千，四分秖是界內惑耳。如大乘中三昧波羅密等之所治者，皆界外惑，故知善吉具有界外，名同類同，故大士訶之云無異也。 > Second, reducing them to being identical with dust and toil. Regarding "You also fully possess them, hence it is said 'equal'": Jingxi says: "Expressions such as 'eighty thousand' apply to both the Mahāyāna and Hīnayāna. Thus the Kośa states: 'The Muni expounded aggregates of teachings, numbering eighty thousand.' Furthermore, as the Bào'ēn Jīng lists many eighty thousands, these are all eighty thousands within the realm. Matching the four divisions, each division having twenty-one thousand, the four divisions are merely delusions within the realm. As for what is counteracted by samādhis, pāramitās, and so forth in the Mahāyāna, these are all delusions outside the realm; hence we know Subhūti fully possesses those outside the realm. Their names are identical and their categories are identical, which is why the Great Being reproaches him by saying there is no difference." > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 6.51](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.6.51) - [Next: 6.53](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.6.53) - [Up: 6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.6) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779~en-mt.6.52) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.6.52](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.6.52) · Pramāṇa