[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [維摩經略疏垂裕記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779) › 7.20 # 維摩經略疏垂裕記 7.20 維摩經略疏垂裕記 7.20 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [7.20](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.7.20) 問：約於道品，何以不列三四七八？何故五根復居力後？答：此乃別圓果地諸法七科一一獨頭為門。何以用因法相生難耶？ > Question: In terms of the factors of awakening, why are the three, four, seven, and eight not listed? Why do the five faculties come after the powers? Answer: In the fruition stage of the separate and perfect teachings, each of the seven categories among these dharmas stands independently as a gate. Why use the mutual generation of causal dharmas to pose an objection? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 7.19](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.7.19) - [Next: 7.21](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.7.21) - [Up: 7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.7) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779~en-mt.7.20) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.7.20](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.7.20) · Pramāṇa