[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [維摩經略疏垂裕記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779) › 7.21 # 維摩經略疏垂裕記 7.21 維摩經略疏垂裕記 7.21 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [7.21](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.7.21) 問：眼不分教，力何以分？於分仍有判權實耶？答：此亦成於眼家體用。若淨五眼，根力必全。一往文中似相生相，莫不皆以降魔所成，故用降魔以為本也。下去文相並本並生，何但獨頭迭生迭本。 > Question: If the eyes are not divided according to teachings, why are the powers divided? And within the division, is there still a determination between provisional and real? Answer: This also accomplishes the substance and function of the eyes. If the five eyes are purified, the faculties and powers are necessarily complete. In a provisional reading, the text appears to show mutually generative characteristics, but none are not accomplished through the subduing of Māra; hence, subduing Māra is taken as the fundamental. The textual marks below are both fundamental and generative; how could they merely stand independently, generating one another and grounding one another in succession? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 7.20](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.7.20) - [Next: 7.22](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.7.22) - [Up: 7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.7) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779~en-mt.7.21) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.7.21](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.7.21) · Pramāṇa