[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [維摩經略疏垂裕記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779) › 7.60 # 維摩經略疏垂裕記 7.60 維摩經略疏垂裕記 7.60 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [7.60](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.7.60) 五、簡涅槃通前。荊溪云：問亦云至此意者，既通初後，亦應具四。四中方便及以真實，有斥不斥，何不出之？答：雖有此意未見明文者，問此引佛答迦葉之文，此即是文。乃云無者，但未若《華嚴》其文分明，復是《智論》之明文也，亦曰有文故。從「若欲」去，即以義推名異義同以為答意。 > Fifth, examining whether the Nirvāṇa pervades what preceded. Jingxi says: Regarding the question which also says 'reaching this intention': since it pervades the beginning and the end, it should also possess the four. Among the four, regarding expedients and reality, there are those reproached and not reproached; why is this not brought forth? The answer is: 'Although there is this intention, clear text has not been seen.' The question cites the Buddha's answer to Kāśyapa; this is precisely the text. The reason it says there is none is merely that it is not as clear as the text of the \*Avataṃsaka\*, which moreover is the clear text of the \*Mahāprajñāpāramitopadeśa\*; hence it is also said that there is a text. From 'If one wishes' onward, it infers through principle that different names have the same meaning, taking this as the intended answer. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 7.59](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.7.59) - [Next: 7.61](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.7.61) - [Up: 7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.7) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779~en-mt.7.60) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.7.60](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.7.60) · Pramāṇa