[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [維摩經略疏垂裕記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779) › 8.41 # 維摩經略疏垂裕記 8.41 維摩經略疏垂裕記 8.41 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [8.41](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.8.41) 二、答，三：初、明二聖同悟義合通用。「同入不二法門」者，所證妙理一體無殊，四悉隨機立宗兩異。龍樹承於文殊，明一切眾生悉有佛性名一性宗。天親承於彌勒，說三無二有名五性宗。三無者，闡提及定性二乘俱無佛性，不得作佛。二有者，不定及菩薩俱有佛性，未來成佛。故西方此土人到于今有兩宗之異。「今本」下，大師雖承龍樹觀法，其或解釋佛經名相何隔天親。況知內證本同、隨機暫異，故於此文聊用攝義。荊溪云：答意雖爾，一家所用龍樹為宗。 > Second, the answer, which has three parts: first, clarifying that the two sages had the same awakening, so their doctrines may appropriately be used interchangeably. Regarding "entering together the gate of non-dual Dharma," the wonderful principle realized is of one substance without distinction, yet the four siddhāntas establish two different traditions in accordance with capacities. Nāgārjuna inherited from Mañjuśrī, clarifying that all sentient beings possess the Buddha-nature, which is called the school of one lineage. Vasubandhu inherited from Maitreya, explaining the three absences and two presences, which is called the school of five lineages. The three absences are: icchantikas and the fixed-nature two vehicles all lack the Buddha-nature and cannot become Buddhas. The two presences are: the indeterminate and bodhisattvas both possess the Buddha-nature and will become Buddhas in the future. Therefore, people in the Western regions and this land down to the present day have the distinction of two schools. From "now originally..." downward, although the Great Master inherited the contemplation methods of Nāgārjuna, when he occasionally explained the technical terms of the Buddhist sūtras, what barrier was there to Vasubandhu? Furthermore, knowing that their inner realizations were fundamentally identical and only temporarily differed according to capacities, he therefore slightly utilized the doctrines of the \*Mahāyānasaṃgraha\* in this passage. Jingxi says: Although the answer's intent is such, what our school utilizes takes Nāgārjuna as its standard. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 8.40](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.8.40) - [Next: 8.42](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.8.42) - [Up: 8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.8) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779~en-mt.8.41) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.8.41](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.8.41) · Pramāṇa