[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [維摩經略疏垂裕記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779) › 9.38 # 維摩經略疏垂裕記 9.38 維摩經略疏垂裕記 9.38 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [9.38](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.9.38) 二、約三寶訶。「九部為法」者，小乘於十二中，無方廣、授記、無問自說也。「又知法名佛」等者，荊溪云：於中能知即佛義也。「離相名法」者，即向所知體全是法境。既云離相，令知無著。「無為即僧」者，法體既離，故得遍和。若不和者，由法非離。事和尚爾，況理和耶？ > Second, reproaching based on the Three Jewels. "Taking the nine divisions as the Dharma": in the Small Vehicle, among the twelve \[divisions\], there are no vaipulya, vyākaraṇa, or udāna. Regarding "further, knowing the Dharma is called the Buddha" and so forth: Jingxi says, "Here, that which is able to know is the meaning of Buddha. 'Being apart from marks is called Dharma': namely, the substance of what was known just prior is entirely the objective realm of the Dharma. Since it says 'apart from marks', it leads to knowing non-attachment. 'The unconditioned is the Saṅgha': since the substance of the Dharma is apart \[from marks\], it therefore attains pervasive harmony. If there is disharmony, it is because the Dharma is not apart \[from marks\]. If phenomenal harmony is even so, how much more so principle harmony?" > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 9.37](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.9.37) - [Next: 9.39](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.9.39) - [Up: 9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.9) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779~en-mt.9.38) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.9.38](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.9.38) · Pramāṇa