[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [維摩經略疏垂裕記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779) › 9.66 # 維摩經略疏垂裕記 9.66 維摩經略疏垂裕記 9.66 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [9.66](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.9.66) 二、「當知」下，於空具三，二：初、正釋具三。「雖同入空至三智也」者，荊溪云：若據名者，準入空時秖可得名一切智耳。此一切智其理既通，即此一切亦通三諦。「如是入空」下，結成通相也。「如此品所明」者，空中既具慈等三義，義當於假；捨者，義當於中。此即品內所明也。 > Second, under "One should know," \[the text explains that\] emptiness is equipped with the three \[truths\]. It has two parts: first, directly explaining that it is equipped with the three. Regarding "Although equally entering emptiness, up to the three knowledges": Jingxi says that if judged by names, based on the time of entering emptiness, it can only be named all-knowledge. As the principle of this all-knowledge is universally pervasive, this very "all" also pervades the three truths. Under "Entering emptiness in this way," it concludes the common aspect. Regarding "As explained in this chapter": since emptiness is already equipped with the three meanings of kindness and so forth, in meaning it corresponds to the provisional; equanimity in meaning corresponds to the middle. This is precisely what is explained within the chapter. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 9.65](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.9.65) - [Next: 9.67](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.9.67) - [Up: 9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.9) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779~en-mt.9.66) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.9.66](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1779.9.66) · Pramāṇa