[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [說無垢稱經疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1782) › 2.43 # 說無垢稱經疏 2.43 說無垢稱經疏 2.43 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.43](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1782.2.43) 二、出體者，〈決擇分〉五十七云「佛具知根，以慧根為體。」《對法論》云「若定若慧，及彼相應諸心心所。」〈菩薩地〉云「謂總五根為其自性。」雖復三文不同，然體有五：一、最勝體。故〈決擇分〉「佛具知根，慧根為性。」二、引出體。故《對法》云「若定若慧」。三、剋實體。〈菩薩地〉云「五根為性」。由慧勝故，且說十力慧為自性。所以但言處非處等智力，不言信力、精進等力，依此即會〈決擇〉文訖。四、相應體。《對法》又云「及彼相應諸心心所，四蘊為性。」五、眷屬體。五蘊為性，定共道共、無漏色等亦為體故。此雖無文，理必應爾，遮犯戒垢、助摧怨故。 > Second, identifying their essential nature: Fascicle 57 of the Viniścayasaṃgrahaṇī says: 'The Buddha possesses the faculty of complete knowledge (ājñātāvīndriya), taking the faculty of discernment (prajñā) as its nature.' The Abhidharmasamuccayavyākhyā says: 'Either concentration (samādhi) or wisdom (prajñā), and their associated minds and mental factors.' The Bodhisattvabhūmi says: 'The five faculties in aggregate are taken as their intrinsic nature.' Although these three texts differ, their essential nature has five aspects: 1. The supreme nature. Thus the Viniścayasaṃgrahaṇī states: 'The Buddha possesses the faculty of complete knowledge, taking the faculty of discernment as its nature.' 2. The inducing nature. Thus the Abhidharmasamuccaya\[vyākhyā\] says: 'Either concentration or wisdom.' 3. The precise intrinsic nature. The Bodhisattvabhūmi says: 'Taking the five faculties as nature.' Because wisdom is preeminent, the ten powers are provisionally said to have wisdom as their intrinsic nature. Therefore, it only speaks of the 'knowledge-power of the possible and impossible', etc., without speaking of the 'power of faith', 'power of vigor', and so on; relying on this reconciles the text of the Viniścayasaṃgrahaṇī. 4. The associated nature. The Abhidharmasamuccaya\[vyākhyā\] also states: 'And their associated minds and mental factors, taking the four aggregates as nature.' 5. The retinue nature. Taking the five aggregates as nature, because the precepts accompanying concentration, precepts accompanying the path, untainted form, and so forth, also constitute their nature. Although there is no explicit text for this, it must be so in principle, because they prevent the defilement of breaking precepts and assist in destroying rivals. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.42](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1782.2.42) - [Next: 2.44](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1782.2.44) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1782.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1782~en-mt.2.43) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (3) - [瑜伽師地論](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.darsana.yogacara.yogacarabhumi*zh-xuanzang.50.7) — Classical Chinese - [妙法蓮華經玄贊](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1723.3.31) — Classical Chinese - [大方廣佛華嚴經疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1735.8.5) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1782.2.43](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1782.2.43) · Pramāṇa