[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [金光明最勝王經疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1788) › 2.17 # 金光明最勝王經疏 2.17 金光明最勝王經疏 2.17 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.17](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1788.2.17) 問：文中既有總別不同，涅槃何故不如三身別品？答：以文少故、事相同故，合為一品。 > Question: Since the text has general and specific differences, why is nirvāṇa not treated in a separate chapter like the three bodies? Answer: Because the text is brief and the matters share the same characteristics, they are combined into a single chapter. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.16](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1788.2.16) - [Next: 2.18](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1788.2.18) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1788.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1788~en-mt.2.17) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1788.2.17](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1788.2.17) · Pramāṇa