[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [楞伽阿跋多羅寶經註解](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1789) › 4.57 # 楞伽阿跋多羅寶經註解 4.57 楞伽阿跋多羅寶經註解 4.57 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [4.57](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1789.4.57) 夢幻等，喻世間之法無因而現，其相本虛，並顯不生之義，其所破立則折伏外道有因之論，申暢無生之義。然外道本計無因而生，而言有因者，蓋彼所言不生不滅乃是妄計，實為生死之因，故斥其為有因論也。外論既滅，則正法流行，無生之論熾然而說，使彼外道聞而恐怖也。 > Dreams, illusions, and so forth are analogies for the dharmas of the world appearing without a cause, their characteristics being fundamentally empty, which also reveals the meaning of non-arising. What is refuted and established is: subduing the tīrthikas' doctrines that assert a cause, and proclaiming the meaning of non-arising. However, the tīrthikas originally conceptualize arising without a cause, yet why is it said they 'assert a cause'? Because what they call non-arising and non-cessation is a false conceptualization that is in truth the cause of saṃsāra, hence he rebukes it as a 'doctrine that asserts a cause.' When external doctrines are destroyed, the true Dharma flows forth, and the doctrine of non-arising is proclaimed blazing forth, terrifying those tīrthikas upon hearing it. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 4.56](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1789.4.56) - [Next: 4.58](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1789.4.58) - [Up: 4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1789.4) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1789~en-mt.4.57) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1789.4.57](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1789.4.57) · Pramāṇa