[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [注大乘入楞伽經](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791) › 10.42 # 注大乘入楞伽經 10.42 注大乘入楞伽經 10.42 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [10.42](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.10.42) 然同教中雖同前前，而中間三教亦得分同於後。如《圓覺經》有圓教法界三觀，《攝論》等有實教行相。然有其所同，無其所別；有其義而無其教。唯成當教中義。由諸經論有如是同別、共不共等法門，出沒相涉，故方便立五教不同。 > However, in the identical teaching, although it is identical with the preceding ones, the three middle teachings are also partially identical with the subsequent ones. For example, the Sūtra of Perfect Enlightenment has the three contemplations of the Dharma realm of the complete teaching, and the Mahāyānasaṃgraha and so forth have the active marks of the real teaching. Yet they have that with which they are identical, but lack that by which they are distinct; they have the meaning, but lack the teaching. They only constitute the meaning within their own teaching. Because the various sūtras and treatises have such Dharma doors of identity and distinction, commonality and uncommonality, emerging and submerging and mutually interpenetrating, the five different teachings are expediently established. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 10.41](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.10.41) - [Next: 10.43](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.10.43) - [Up: 10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.10) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791~en-mt.10.42) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.10.42](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.10.42) · Pramāṇa