<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.3.152 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [注大乘入楞伽經](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791) › 3.152

# 注大乘入楞伽經 3.152

注大乘入楞伽經 3.152

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [3.152](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.3.152)

此二種執我，或有有情總執補特伽羅為我，或有有情別執色受想行識等為我。故《瑜伽》云「補特伽羅無我者，謂離一切緣生行外，別有實我，不可得故。法無我者，謂即一切緣生諸行，性非實我，是無常故。」是故經云「當善觀察。」上略通釋竟。下文即別廣釋。

> Regarding these two kinds of grasping at a self: some sentient beings universally grasp the pudgala as a self, while other sentient beings distinctly grasp form, sensation, conception, volitional formations, and consciousness as a self. Therefore the Yogācāra\[-bhūmi\] states: 'Pudgala-nairātmya means that apart from all conditioned formations arising from conditions, no separate real self can be apprehended. Dharma-nairātmya means that the very formations arising from conditions are not in their nature a real self, because they are impermanent.' For this reason the sūtra says: 'You should observe well.' Above, the general explanation is briefly concluded; below, the text will explain them extensively and distinctly.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 3.151](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.3.151)
- [Next: 3.153](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.3.153)
- [Up: 3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.3)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791~en-mt.3.152) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.3.152](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1791.3.152) · Pramāṇa
